 |
Open
Pit Mining
|
Micro-seismic Monitoring of slopes
Careful geotechnical monitoring of open pit slopes
has become important in modern planned-risk designs. Micro-seismic
monitoring of such slopes can record and quantify detectable signatures
of fracturing, located in 3-D space.
Potential Benefits of Micro-seismic monitoring of slope stability
1. Micro-seismic activity of the slope as a whole,
when taken as a proxy for macroscopic slope stability, yields a
useful indication of when particular mining activities are affecting
slope stability, and by how much.
2. Micro-seismic monitoring can give an indication
whether a particular known geological structure is seismologically
active or not. If many seismic events occur on or near the structure,
then it is likely that the structure is slipping. Indeed, planes
of weakness defined by seismic events may indicate previously unknown
geological structures that may be confirmed by other geotechnical
means.
3. From the seismic event locations and sizes,
it is possible to infer relative surface movements resulting from
this micro-seismicity. Surface movement is also recorded by conventional
surveying of prisms. Comparisons between these two forms of data
has revealed that the seismic data may be able to indicate regions
of surface movement 30-45 days before these movements are seen on
the surface. This delay would depend on rock properties and the
locations of the seismic events.
The usefulness of micro-seismic monitoring stems
from the fact that cracks are located wherever they occur, and so
a 3-D picture of the rock mass is obtained unlike the 2-D picture
obtained with conventional surface monitoring. It is not so much
a short-term slope-failure warning technique (like a trip wire),
but rather a system for longer term understanding of where rock
weaknesses are occurring.
Practical Implementation
Modern micro-seismic arrays are installed behind
specific slopes in long inclined holes. The holes are either drilled
from access points on the slope (ramps or berms) or, if necessary,
from outside the pit. The design of the array must result in a 3-dimensional
spread of seismic sensors around
the volume of rock that is of interest.
Usually two sensors are installed into each hole.
These sensors are connected to a StandAlone
QS data logger at the top of the hole. This station either communicates
with a central computer via licence-free microwave radios or records
data onto local hard disks and can be powered with a small solar
panel.
Communications
Off-line
The local hard disks of each of the GS's are connected to the PRTS
either in the field or at the office and seismic data is downloaded.
Seismograms of common events are post-associated for off-line processing
and interpretation. This hard disk medium is the cheapest form of
communication for applications where real-time monitoring is not
essential.
On-line
Licence-free microwave radios and repeaters can be used to permanently
connect the GS network
to the central site.
Power
The low power consumption of the GS (less than
1W/channel) allows use of an inexpensive solar panel and battery
unit, making the seismic station completely independent.
Seismic Sensors
Each GS data acquisition unit can monitor and
pre-process up to six seismic signals, in any combination of uni-,
bi- or tri-axial seismic sensors.
For each seismic channel up to 3 logical
channels may be extracted with GS technology. Both geophones
and accelerometers (piezoelectric and Force-Balance) are currently
supported.
Seismic Data Processing & Interpretation
The seismograms of every seismic event that triggers
multiple stations are transmitted to the seismic
controller and recorded on a user-specific computer on the Local
Area Network (LAN). The seismic data is regularly transferred to
ISS's offices. Here the seismic data is processed and quality controlled
according to ISO 9001 procedures. The seismic data is then analyzed
and a standard report and Jdi project
regularly submitted to the mine geotechnical engineer. In this way
all seismological tasks are accomplished off-site leaving the geotechnical
engineer free to do his job.
This page last updated: January
2007
|
|